![]() Sections 301, 302(b), and 333 of the Communications Act generally prohibit the importation, use, marketing, and manufacture of cell phone jammers because jammers are designed to impede authorized communications and can disrupt safety communications, such as 911 calls. Both managers showed the agents the locations of the jamming devices and voluntarily surrendered them. The Enforcement Bureau agents then inspected the worksites and interviewed the managers of the two companies, both of whom admitted that they had purchased the jammers online and operated them at their worksites-one company for a period of two years and the other for a period of a few months. Using direction finding techniques, the agents discovered strong wideband emissions on the cellular bands and determined that the source of these emissions was from signal jammers. ![]() In both instances, agents from the FCC’s Enforcement Bureau responded to anonymous complaints and inspected the worksites. ![]() This month, the FCC continued to take action against the use of illegal cell phone jammers by issuing two hefty Notices of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (“NAL”) against two companies, one in Alabama and one in Louisiana, both of which used several cell phone jamming devices at their worksites.Īs described in the two NALs, each company purchased four cell phone jammers from various Internet sources (and a fifth jammer as a backup) and installed them throughout their worksites to prevent their employees from using cell phones while working. The FCC has long kept a careful eye on the sale and use of illegal cell phone jamming devices that interfere with cellular communications. Use of Cell Phone Jammers to Prevent Cell Phone Use during Working Hours Does Not Pay Off
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |